Chris says at the end: “Talk back about your own style of looking at art.”
I spontaneously attended the Madonna concert the other night. A friend offered an extra free ticket an hour before the show. My calculation was: Straight guys don’t attend Madonna concerts (at least they don’t brag about it) vs. Madonna is an iconic figure, she was my first crush, and she kicks ass.
So the show got going and so did my body. I couldn’t have stopped dancing and moving my body for anything – and we were way up in the balcony. I bring this episode up because at one point during the show I looked around and gasped at how many motionless bodies surrounded me, staring awe like at Madonna. I was sad for them, they were missing out on her true art – bring’n the dance…the party…the swing.
I was reminded of this when John Maeda spoke of the passive nature of looking at things.
People can be so reluctant to engage. But art is a two-way street.
The greatest architecture is not great because it’s pretty, it’s great when you walk, work, live, or pray IN it. The way the sun is directed in like a vital piece of furniture, or the way the stairs fantastically wiggle up, or the way that the hallways force people to run into each other.
Yet, the architecture tours still pass by with camera-toting people, outside looking in – outside looking in.
For magazine Acrobata Brasil
11 years ago
1 comment:
Keep on dancing, my friend. Nice words.
Post a Comment